Compare · code-intel servers

Sverklo vs Serena, GitNexus, Greptile

Six dimensions, four products. Numbers below are from sverklo-bench v2 (2026-05-20) using each project's public configuration. The "win" column is per-dimension. Sverklo doesn't win every column on purpose — the rows where competitors win are part of the point.

Dimension Sverklo Serena GitNexus Greptile
License MIT MIT BSL (restricted commercial) Closed source
Where the code runs Local-first, never leaves the machine Local-first Local + optional cloud Cloud-only (uploads source)
Audit-gap detection (sverklo-bench v2) 89% 62% 71% 78%
Languages indexed 4 (TS, JS, Python, Go) 12 (incl. Rust, Java, C++) 8 12+ via cloud parser
Install steps (zero-to-MCP) 1 (npm i -g sverklo && sverklo init) 3 (clone, build, configure) 4 (clone, build, license-key, configure) 2 (signup, install IDE plugin)
Cost Free, MIT Free, MIT Free under BSL terms $30/seat/month
Methodology. Numbers come from sverklo-bench v2 run against each project's default configuration on 2026-05-20. The "audit-gap" dimension is defined in the bench README. PRs to the bench are welcome from any of the four projects' maintainers — if you can reproduce different numbers, the bench updates.

Per-product deep dives

Each comparison links to a longer page with full bench-row reproduction commands, the specific use cases where the product wins, and the trade-offs.

The dimensions sverklo doesn't optimize for

If you need a language sverklo doesn't index (Rust, Java, C++, Ruby, Swift), pick Serena. If you want a fully managed service with no local install, pick Greptile. The MIT + local-first + zero-config combination is sverklo's wedge; everything else is conscious trade-off.

Want a row updated?

Open a PR on github.com/sverklo/sverklo with a reproduction. If the number on this page is wrong, we'd rather know. Try sverklo.